Project Management Software for Small Teams

Start with the constraint that changes the choice

I recommend shortlisting project software around the work that needs improving: ClickUp for task-based backlog planning, monday work management for structured requests, GitHub Projects for repository-linked delivery and Trello for a compact shared board. Keep your current process in the comparison. A new subscription should solve a specific problem, not just add another place to track it.

I have used ClickUp, monday work management, GitHub Projects and Trello. The shortlist is organised by workflow fit; it is not a scored benchmark. Linked product details were checked on 9 September 2026.

First decide whether the problem is request intake, backlog organisation, repository-linked delivery or simply unclear ownership. A single owner and a consistent review routine may solve the last problem without a new subscription. Do not select a tool before agreeing the work it must improve.

Shortlist by the work you need to do — Criteria for a practical shortlist, not a scored product ranking or a promise of the best software. Diagram: AppTrajectory.

Four candidates and the current process

ClickUp is a candidate for task-based project planning and backlog organisation. Validate whether the team understands locations, priorities and status, and whether the chosen plan meets the access and exit requirements.

monday work management is a candidate for structured request intake and board-based coordination. Check the form mapping, approval responsibility, duplicate handling and the real billable seat bundle. Keep CRM and dev outside this shortlist.

GitHub Projects documents table, board and roadmap views linked to issues and pull requests. Investigate it when delivery already lives in GitHub; test whether non-developer reviewers can complete their part without creating another tracking process.

Trello’s pricing page lists a Free plan for up to ten collaborators per Workspace and ten boards. It is a candidate for a compact shared task board. Check whether the required approval record, permissions and export route fit the actual plan before treating free access as a complete solution.

The current shared register is a fifth option. Record its owner, review cadence, access boundary and method of retaining decisions. Apply the same task exercise instead of treating the baseline as automatically inferior.

Use comparable evidence

Run the same synthetic request through each plausible candidate: intake, ownership, priority, acceptance criteria, a prohibited access attempt, approval, status communication and export. Eliminate a candidate only for an essential requirement or a documented tradeoff the team accepts.

Illustrative decision note: “External reviewers must only see their client’s records; export must preserve the approver and accepted version.” This is stronger than “easy to use”, because the pilot can establish whether it is met. It is a proposed criterion, not a result.

Price the working arrangement

Record the required plan, internal members, guests, minimum billable seats, currency and billing cycle. Add training, administration, migration, overlap and exit work. Check paid automation or AI requirements separately. An advertised per-seat rate does not establish the whole cost.

Use the requirements worksheet before the evaluation scorecard. Set criteria before scoring and retain evidence beside each score. Do not use commission as a criterion.

Turn the shortlist into a choice

Use the ClickUp and monday comparison if those two approaches fit your requirements. Include GitHub Projects or Trello when their documented model better matches where the team already works. Give each serious candidate the same relevant tasks and cost assumptions; do not score an untested permission boundary as passed.

Pick one or two candidates that fit the actual workflow, name the person who will maintain the setup and agree a decision date. I would keep the current system available until essential access and exit checks pass. If no candidate clears those gates, improve the process or resolve the remaining requirement before buying.

Compare the candidates

Shortlist by workflow to investigate
Candidate	Reason to investigate	Main check
ClickUp	Task-based backlog planning	Can the team maintain the hierarchy and obtain the required permissions/export route?
monday work management	Structured project-request intake	Do mapping, ownership and approval survive invalid and duplicated submissions?
GitHub Projects	Work already tracked in issues and pull requests	Can non-developer participants perform their work with the intended access?
Trello	A compact shared board	Does the chosen plan support the required controls and exit record?
Current process	Ownership and review already work	Is the actual cost or failure rate sufficient to justify switching?

Which one I would choose

For a six-person team that only needs a shared internal board, my first choice is Trello Free, provided the workspace remains within its collaborator and board limits and the required controls are available. For a growing backlog of delivery tasks, I would choose ClickUp. For a coordinator managing structured request intake, I would choose monday work management. For software work already tracked in GitHub issues and pull requests, I would choose GitHub Projects. Those are different winning use cases, not an overall ranking shaped by referral links.

Cost and limitations for the same six-person internal team
Option	Subscription arithmetic	Why the number is not the whole decision
Trello Free	$0 within the published free allowance	Up to ten collaborators and ten boards; do not assume paid export or observer controls.
Trello Standard, annual billing	6 × $5 × 12 = $360 USD	Consider for its additional board and field features; it is not equivalent to every Premium control.
Trello Premium, annual billing	6 × $10 × 12 = $720 USD	Consider when its views, observers or simple data export are required.
ClickUp	Unlimited $504; Business $864 USD annually	Select by required controls and recurring export needs, not just the lower total.
monday work management	Ten-seat subscription for six internal members	The matched-plan price is not established here; compare the actual total per active person.
GitHub Projects or the current register	Use the existing account and required access costs	A tool already paid for can still require administration or a different permission arrangement.

Price inputs: Trello and ClickUp checked 23 September 2026. All priced rows use six paid members, twelve months and annual billing, excluding tax, guests, extras and labour. The plans are listed for different requirements, not presented as feature-equivalent. ClickUp versus monday examines the closer buying choice.

My main caution is to avoid moving repository delivery into another system merely to get a second board, or moving a simple board into a configurable suite without a requirement for the extra structure. The better choice reduces the work the team must keep consistent.

Explore the options

View ClickUp · View monday work management

Sources and scope

The sources below support the feature, price and plan details in this guide. Prices and limits may change; check the actual order and plan.